<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax Court Denies Legitimate $19M Charitable Contribution Deduction for Failure to Comply With Appraisal Requirements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 02:37:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Second Circuit&#8217;s Decision to Reverse Scheidelman Gives Second Life to Charitable Contribution Deduction &#171; Double Taxation: A Take On All Things Taxes</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Second Circuit&#8217;s Decision to Reverse Scheidelman Gives Second Life to Charitable Contribution Deduction &#171; Double Taxation: A Take On All Things Taxes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-3579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] During 2004, Steve and Rory Rothman executed a conservation deed of easement to the National Architectural trust, a donee that likely doomed the taxpayers from the start. The Rothmans engaged Mitchell, Maxwell &amp; Jackson, Inc. (MMJ) to perform the qualified appraisal supporting the contribution. (For more on the qualified appraisal rules, see here). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] During 2004, Steve and Rory Rothman executed a conservation deed of easement to the National Architectural trust, a donee that likely doomed the taxpayers from the start. The Rothmans engaged Mitchell, Maxwell &amp; Jackson, Inc. (MMJ) to perform the qualified appraisal supporting the contribution. (For more on the qualified appraisal rules, see here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tax Court Really, Really Hates Your Charitable Contribution: Rothman v.Commissioner, Examined &#171; Double Taxation: A Take On All Things Taxes</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-2768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Tax Court Really, Really Hates Your Charitable Contribution: Rothman v.Commissioner, Examined &#171; Double Taxation: A Take On All Things Taxes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-2768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the second time in three weeks, the Tax Court denied a deduction for the charitable contribution of property for failure to comply [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the second time in three weeks, the Tax Court denied a deduction for the charitable contribution of property for failure to comply [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Week in Review: 5.28 &#8211; 6.1.2012 &#171; Double Taxation: A Take On All Things Taxes</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-2638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Week in Review: 5.28 &#8211; 6.1.2012 &#171; Double Taxation: A Take On All Things Taxes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-2638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the biggest news of the week, a California entrepeneur watches a $19M charitable contribution deduction go up in smoke for failure to follow appraisal/substantiation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the biggest news of the week, a California entrepeneur watches a $19M charitable contribution deduction go up in smoke for failure to follow appraisal/substantiation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News for Nonprofits &#171; Cash Accounting and Consulting</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[News for Nonprofits &#171; Cash Accounting and Consulting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 16:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-2637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Tax Court Denies Legitimate $19M Charitable Contribution Deduction for Failure to Comply With Apprai... by WithumSmithBrown [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tax Court Denies Legitimate $19M Charitable Contribution Deduction for Failure to Comply With Apprai&#8230; by WithumSmithBrown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-2596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 05:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-2596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@CPA - don&#039;t assume. I see plenty of LegalZoom crap out there, and I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if he cheaped out on the trust as well. 

This year&#039;s favorite: the client who told me she formed a corporation last year, and then told me she 1099&#039;d herself. Fun]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CPA &#8211; don&#8217;t assume. I see plenty of LegalZoom crap out there, and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if he cheaped out on the trust as well. </p>
<p>This year&#8217;s favorite: the client who told me she formed a corporation last year, and then told me she 1099&#8242;d herself. Fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WithumSmith Brown, CPAs</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-2593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WithumSmith Brown, CPAs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-2593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JR, you may have a point on the rules being necessary, but as for being onerous, we&#039;ll have to agree to disagree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR, you may have a point on the rules being necessary, but as for being onerous, we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-2592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rules are neither onerous or unnecessary.  If one is going to deduct something that is worth a substantial amount of money, the IRS is well within its right - acting on behalf of all taxpayers in this case - to make sure that the deduction is proper.  It doesn&#039;t matter that the taxpayer in this case understated the value of his property.  The fact that he was the donor and donee and appraiser - that&#039;s bupkis - he should have known better.  The only thing I agree with is that he should have retained a CPA to prepare the return.  Would he do brain surgery on himself if he could buy a $30 program from Best Buy to help him do it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rules are neither onerous or unnecessary.  If one is going to deduct something that is worth a substantial amount of money, the IRS is well within its right &#8211; acting on behalf of all taxpayers in this case &#8211; to make sure that the deduction is proper.  It doesn&#8217;t matter that the taxpayer in this case understated the value of his property.  The fact that he was the donor and donee and appraiser &#8211; that&#8217;s bupkis &#8211; he should have known better.  The only thing I agree with is that he should have retained a CPA to prepare the return.  Would he do brain surgery on himself if he could buy a $30 program from Best Buy to help him do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiseman</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-2591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wiseman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 19:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-2591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tell Mohammed to ask for his donation back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell Mohammed to ask for his donation back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR 553</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-2590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JR 553]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 18:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-2590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too bad Mohamed didn&#039;t present tax court or the IRS with the fact that cfr §1.170-13 has no force and effect of law according to Chrysler v. Brown and is NOT valid as a substantive regulation.  The only method to get the tax court to apply this well documented standard of review is to make judicial notice of it via the APA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad Mohamed didn&#8217;t present tax court or the IRS with the fact that cfr §1.170-13 has no force and effect of law according to Chrysler v. Brown and is NOT valid as a substantive regulation.  The only method to get the tax court to apply this well documented standard of review is to make judicial notice of it via the APA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WithumSmith Brown, CPAs</title>
		<link>http://double-taxation.com/2012/05/29/tax-court-denies-legitimate-19m-charitable-contribution-deduction-for-failure-to-comply-with-appraisal-requirements/#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WithumSmith Brown, CPAs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://double-taxation.com/?p=3502#comment-2588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoops, definately a typo victim. Changed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, definately a typo victim. Changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
