Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May 9th, 2012

Yesterday, the Senate failed to achieve the 60 votes necessary for Senate bill S. 2343, the “Stop the Student Loan Interest Rate Hike Act of 2012,” to advance. The bill would have paid for the lost revenue caused by keeping the interest rate on subsidized Stafford loans steady at 3.4% for another year by closing a long-standing S corporation “loophole” (their words, not mine).

The loophole in reference is the ability of S corporation shareholder/employees under current law to forego compensation in favor of distributions to reduce their payroll tax obligation. The Senate bill would have taken a hybrid approach to closing the loophole by subjecting the income allocated to shareholders of “professional service” S corporations — law, lobbying, accounting etc… — to self-employment tax only if:

1. the shareholder provides substantial services to the S corporation;

2. 75% or more of the gross income of the business is attributable to 3 or fewer shareholders; and

3. the shareholder has AGI > $250,000 if MFJ and $200,000 if single.

With the Senate bill dead — and with no other bill currently in the pipeline to close the loophole — S corporation shareholder-employees can continue to play the compensation/distribution game, but be warned…the IRS is watching.

Read Full Post »

On corporate tax returns, it’s second nature to disallow any deductions for “officer’s life insurance premiums” expensed on the corporation’s books. But why do we do it?

Under I.R.C. § 101, life insurance proceeds paid upon the death of an insured to the beneficiary are generally excludable from the beneficiary’s income. Thus, when a corporation takes out a life insurance policy on one if its key employees — and the corporation is both the owner and beneficiary of the policy – the proceeds paid to the corporation upon the death of the employee are generally tax-exempt.

Because I.R.C. § 101 serves to exclude life insurance proceeds from income, I.R.C. § 264 prevents a second tax benefit by disallowing a deduction for any premiums paid on a policy on which the payor is the beneficiary. That way, the taxpayer doesn’t get a deduction for premiums AND tax-exempt proceeds when the policy is paid out.

But did you know that for policies issued after August 17, 2006, the proceeds from corporate owned life insurance policies may be taxable to the corporation upon receipt? Unless certain notice and consent requirements are met, I.R.C. § 101(j) provides that life insurance premiums paid to a corporation upon the death of an employee will be excludable from income only to the extent of any premiums or other amounts paid for the policy. Proceeds in excess of such costs will be taxable to the corporation.

In order for the entire amount of life insurance proceeds to be tax-exempt to the beneficiary corporation, the employee must:

1. Be notified in writing that the applicable policyholder (employer) intends to insure the employee’s life and of the maximum face amount of the policy at the time of issue,

2. Must provide written consent to being insured and that the coverage may continue after the insured terminates employment, and

3. Must be informed in writing that the applicable policyholder (employer) will be a beneficiary of any proceeds payable upon the death of the employee.

In addition, every applicable policyholder corporation owning one or more employer-owned life insurance contracts issued after August 17, 2006 must file a Form 8925 for each year such contracts are owned, showing:

1. The number of employees at the end of the year and the number of those employees insured under employer-owned life insurance contracts;

2. The total amount of insurance in force under such contracts at the end of the year;

3. The name, address, TIN, and type of business of the applicable policyholder; and

4. That the applicable policyholder has a valid consent for each insured employee or the number of insured employees for which no consent has been obtained.

A few weeks ago, in PLR  201217017, the IRS ruled that a corporation met the notice and consent requirements even where the corporation failed to acquire separate documentation prior to purchasing life insurance contracts on each shareholder/employee that explicitly satisfied the items detailed in I.R.C. § 101(j).

Instead, the corporation required each shareholder/employee to fill out insurance applications that indicated that the corporation was to be the owner and beneficiary of the policy, as well as the amount of coverage being obtained, while also requiring the shareholder/employees to sign an agreement dictating that if the shareholder terminates his ownership  interest, the shareholder has the right to purchase the policy from the corporation.

The IRS concluded that between the application and the agreement signed by the participating shareholder/employees, the notice and consent requirements had been met and I.R.C. § 101(j) was satisfied. Thus, proceeds received by the corporation upon the death of any of the insured’s will be tax-free under I.R.C. § 101.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 650 other followers